Li Wang,Rongqing Li,Xudong Feng,Shuling Song,Yong Zhang. Extramedullary skeletal muscle metastasis of glioblastoma: A case report and literature review. Oncol Transl Med, 2016, 2: 189-193.
Extramedullary skeletal muscle metastasis of glioblastoma: A case report and literature review
Received:April 27, 2016  Revised:July 21, 2016
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
KeyWord:glioblastoma; metastasis; histopathology
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Li Wang Department of Pathology, Kunming General Hospital, Kunming 650032, China 2001wl@163.com 
Rongqing Li Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650032, China lrqmxl@126.com 
Xudong Feng Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650032, China fxd23@sina.com 
Shuling Song Department of Pathology, Kunming General Hospital, Kunming 650032, China 871819779@qq.com 
Yong Zhang Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650032, China newkaryon@163.com 
Hits: 6308
Download times: 7091
Abstract:
      Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the clinicopathologic, immunophenotypic, and diagnostic features of extramedullary metastases of glioblastoma. Methods: One case of extramedullary skeletal muscle metastasis of glioblastoma was studied, including the clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features. Results: A 24-year-old man underwent surgical resection for glioblastoma (WHO grade IV) in the left temporal parietal region followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide therapy. One year and nine months later, he developed an extramedullary skeletal muscle metastasis in L4, and the histology was remarkably different from that of the primary glioblastoma specimen. The immunohistochemical analysis also showed changes. In the metastasis, the small cells were negative for GFAP; weakly positive for S-100; and positive for nestin, NSE, and CD56, with 60% of cells positive for p53 and 40% positive for Ki-67. The giant cells showed strong positivity for GFAP and S-100, and weak expression of p53, Ki-67, nestin, NSE, and CD56. The primary glioblastoma specimen showed strong positivity for GFAP and S-100 and was negative for NSE, nestin, and CD56, with around 25% of the tumor cells positive for p53 and a Ki-67 labeling index of 20%. Conclusion: Extraneural metastasis (ENM) is a rare complication of glial tumors and glioma stem cells may be related to the metastasis. Since extraneural metastasis may occur in patients without central nervous symptoms, any unusual signs during the follow-up of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma should not be underestimated.
Close